Friday, 11 October 2013

Evaluation

Evaluation
Our version of A Doll’s House, act 3, was set up on more of a contemporary level as we sat along the outside of the performance space and there were two squares, one each side, we had to work within. This was to show claustrophobia and no escape.

the first performance was in front of our peers and strand teachers. We watched and performed our scenes in chronological order. I really liked the fact we had as chance to have a full dress rehearsal with costumes, lights and audience. This is because, we could run threw our scene how we thought to run it and if something really didn’t or even really did work we could fix or keep possessions and movements. For example, I felt in this first performance I kept up staging myself as Charles was sitting behind me and I kept looking back towards him a bit too often. Something I considered to go well was, mine and Charles’s timing when we were talking over and cutting each other off. Although, one of my sections of speech I gave a too long gap and Charles came in earlier.

Our second performance in the evening I felt had more energy. I felt a lot more nervous and syked up for this one, which was odd as I didn’t think I could get more than I was from our first showing. There was an all rounded flow of energy from all of us, I feel everyone’s queues and lines were really great. For my scene I felt I got the right balance of turning back and talking to Charles and looking forward to the audience and talking.

One person that very much stood out for me was Charles. I love his portray of Torvald and I think he capturers his scenes remarkably.  His use of articulation and the way he spoke I feel just made the character. Also I feel Charles’s comic timing was amazing during the scene with Daisy and Adam where he is drunk. 

 




Themes of A Doll’s House

Themes of A Doll’s House

 Inheriting
the theme of inheriting mistakes and dishonesty is pasted down, is a big theme in the play. Dr. Rank has inherited his father’s spinal disease because of his father’s sexual indiscretions. Nora refuse to see her children as she is worried that she will/has corrupted them  due to her act of fraud of signing her father’s signature.
If you immoral and don’t bide by the rules all your mistakes will be inherited.


Gender             
one of the main focuses in the play is gender and how women are perceived as mothers and wives. Torvald’s view on her is completely narrow minded as he calls her also his child, which insinuates that he is saying she is child-like and cannot look, think or do anything by herself.

Materialism
money and clothes are also big themes in a Doll’s house.  Torvald and Nora are both obsessed with money, but we find out Nora is obsessed with it for another reason. Material things, looking good, for your husband and reputation is portrayed through the whole of the play.

Scene with music and no text

Scene with music and no text
We ran our scenes in with none of the speech but with music. I felt Charles and I found this difficult with our scene as we do not have any movement in ours yet. We couldn’t really feel the right emotions and connections because of this. Getting up and looking around at others scenes really helped with my connections with other characters and my helped with reassuring my true feelings in my scene. I really liked the look of everyone’s physicality in this exercise, everything seemed to flow. The music looked as though it brought out the deepest emotions in all of the characters, especially through the eye contact of some of the scenes.

Finding the subtext of the play

Finding the subtext of the play
subtext- the real meaning behind the text. What the character really wants to say.
“do you notice anything odd about the way we’re sitting?”  Nora doesn’t literally mean the way they’re sitting she really means she’s talking and Torvald is starting to actually listen to what she has to say.

Bits and units

Bits and units
bits and units are very small segments, normally a couple of lines, of text that you can give actions for.  Turkey Analogy – One of Stanislavski metaphors  is that a play is like a turkey. You can’t eat the whole turkey all at once, you have to cut it up into smaller ‘bits’ to eat it.



Action, objective, super objective.

Action, objective, super objective.
your action has to effect another person to achieve your objective and you have to complete your objective to succeed your super objective.

“Go to the woods”

“Go to the woods”
This exercise was really fun to do. Saying “go to the woods” as many ways as you can is a lot harder than it seems.
Angry, anxious, apologetic, apprehensive, boastful, bored, calm, child-like, forceful, happy, sad, sarcastic, seductive, threatening, tired
There are so many ways you can say this line but a lot of them sound exactly the same.

Walking around as Nora

Walking around as Nora
This time round we were feeling and seeing Nora’s house. I found it so much easier I really thought I could see threw Nora’s eyes to her house. Seeing her furniture, the walls, lights and doors. Even noticing details. With this exercise if I was looking at a chair I could imagine what Nora’s chair would look like, but if I closed my eyes or slightly looked away I could imagine what her chair looked like and the feel the material. Noticing the designs on the wall paper, there was no chipped wallpaper. Everything was pristine, no mess.
Mannerisms, how do I walk as Nora? How do I sit as Nora? We did an exercise in voice like this so it was good to see how my thoughts and the way I present myself as Nora has changed.
We then added a sentence for our character and said it in all different ways you could make it come across. “you don’t understand do you?”

We are selfish people

We walked around the space and felt everything in detail. We all need to know and trust our space. Actors are selfish people.

Emotive memory

Emotive memoryWe laid in semi-supine and thought about our most happiest place. Where it is? what you can see? what it smells like? what are you doing? What are people around you doing? Etc. I choose my house in Wales as all my memories are amazing there. I started with what I could see, fields, cows and long roads. Then I went deeper into this. What I could smell, fresh air, farm and freshly cut grass. How it felt was the hardest, the warmness but chilly breeze, the cold patio under me, how happy I feel when I am there and think about it. 

My scene
I am Nora it is one of the end scenes of the play. Torvald now knows everything about the money and fraud. I feel I have quite important scene of the play, as Nora is talk about how she was just a doll her whole life and how her two main male figures in her life (father and husband) have treated her the same. Like a child and like a toy. She is building up to telling him she is leaving for good. Nora is standing up for herself.
Nora is a very well spoken person, so this is a challenge for me. I’ve started by overly articulating my words, hopefully if I keep practising this I will find it to come and sound more naturally.
My objective in this scene I would say is that I’m trying to explain to Torvald that I realise now I’ve never had my own life somebody had always controlled it. I was a doll my whole life

Circle of attention

Circle of attentionthe small objective would be the characters want in the scene. The main attention would be their overall aim in the play.
You can make more objectives by making more circles of attention. The focus and aim in a line. Then in a scene. Then in the act. Then the main focal point, the play. 



Given Circumstances

Given Circumstances What effects is effecting the character, in the past, present, what is going to happen, what could happen, the environment and personal situations.
4th wall- acting natural not acting for an audience.
To start with, we watching someone just be themselves sitting on chairs in the space by themselves. We analyse their:
-body language
-mannerisms
-facial expression/s
-eye line
With this information you can give them a place where they could be and a time.
Suki paced and tapped her foot, she seemed nervous. So we decided to put her in a doctors waiting room waiting to be seen. I gathered from this exercise that the slightest movements, eye twitches or even your posture can say 100 different things to the audience. You have to be very specific of what you want the audience to be thinking.  

Walking around the room being Nora adding what ifs

Walking around the room being Nora adding what ifs
This was interesting but challenging today. I enjoyed this exercise as it made me really think about how Nora would feel and what Nora would truthfully do in situations such as: What if she felt anxious? I found this ‘what if’ especially as if found myself doing things I would do if I was feeling anxious. I don’t feel as if I know Nora well enough at this point to be able to think exactly how she does. In the near future I’m hoping I will be able to do this without struggle.


Thinking aloud

Thinking aloud 
We all think out loud and talk to ourselves when were on our own subconsciously. When I purposefully have to do it becomes harder as I  had no clue what to say. As you do it for more time it becomes easier and you start to do it without realising. You really start to notice the details in a room whether it is a chip in the pain or a loose wire. You start to ask yourself questions, how did that get there? Why did it happen?   

What if? Magic if

What if? Magic if.
This Stanislavsky exercise is not about over acting and playing up to the circumstance but committing truthfully to the situation.
what if...
-you smelt burning?
-you drop your bag?
-you have a stone in your shoe?
I found and I felt a quite a lot of us found this hard. I think this is because you are in front of an audience you need to act so they get what is happening.
When you drop your bag or something  you’re carrying, in public, why is it so embarrassing? Do people think your life is a mess? You’re not capable of things? 

Stanislavsky’s relaxation method

Stanislavsky’s relaxation method- laying on the floor you tense all the parts of your body individually, then all of them all together. It took so much concentration for me to do the muscles on by one; especially the hands without the arms and foot without calf. When getting up from laying to sitting you use so many unnecessary muscles power, like your forearm and hands/wrists. You just really need to use your core and abdomen.
With this exercise it really helped me with thinking deeply about how much unnecessary energy and muscular strain you don’t need to use. 

monkey into man - melodrama into naturalism

Darwin’s theory with the monkeys into man exercise
This helps making feelings become more internal rather than external. 7 being complete melodrama and 1 being complete naturalism. Even though you feel you’re doing something entirely different but when you stop and look at what everyone else is at 1, all their feelings and characters are in their subtle posture changes and burning threw their eyes. For example the damsel in distress at level7 she looks as if she is craving attention but at 1 she actually needs help

Melodrama

Melodrama
We looked at melodrama and what it is. We also looked at the main 6 stock characters in melodrama: Hero, damsel, lover, villain, wise guy, the fool. I found this helped with learning and feeling the huge difference between melodrama and our naturalism play A Doll’s House. The movement is the key it has to be big and hyperbolic. Melodrama is very 2D it has no inner feelings to it everything is external and fake. The poses and noises we made for our sock characters made me realise how over the top melodrama was and I still find it hard imagining people use to hate naturalism and would only want to see melodramas. The audience wanted to watch people act rather than believe what they see. Melodramatic pieces have very simple plots; very child-like.
I found this quite hard to imagine, people nower days go to the theatre to see real life, a different life, not to see someone overly exaggerating everything they say and do, you would go to the panto for this.
Henrik Ibsen- A Doll’s House.


Nora is treated like one of the children by her husband, Torvald. She does not have her own opinions on matters and she depends entirely on him. Torvald - “My little bluebird...keep her nose clean..sing only sweet little pure notes...” She borrows money off one of Torvald’s employees, Krogstad and is paying him back month by month but Nora has committed fraud, as she signed the IOU for her father as he died shortly before. Krogsad - “You do realise you have committed an act of fraud?” Everything is fine until Nora’s friend Kristine, from her childhood, turns up looking for work. Krogstad finds out Kristine is taking his position at the bank and knows he’ll “...end up back in the gutter.” Torvald finds out from Krogstad through a letter and completely rips into Nora “...Hypocrite. Liar...” “...you’re never seeing the children again...” Another letter is received straight after this argument from Krogstad giving back the IOU and apologising for any upset. Torvald acts like he hasn’t done anything wrong and totally contradicts himself. “...You can’t believe I’ve forgiven you everything?...” “...you did it out of love for me...And you were right to...” Nora suddenly has an epiphany and expresses her thoughts and feelings for the first and last time. “...you just enjoyed the idea of being in love with me...” “...It’s your fault and my father’s fault that I’ve never made anything of myself.” “...I’ve been your doll...” Nora then leaves and slams the door shut behind her.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
My opinion on what one of the meanings behind the play is, is about false love and fear of being alone. Torvald for example likes the idea of being in love with Nora and makes up silly scenarios in his head “secret lover” “wish you were in danger so I could risk my life to keep you safe”. Dr Rank is really in love with Nora but Nora is just a flirt with him and toys with his emotions. Torvald and Nora don’t want Dr Rank to die and leave them, as they see him as being part of their family. This is because he is round their house every day and both their moods seem to be uplifted when he is about. Also with the children, Nora does not spend that much time with them and leaves them with the nanny (Anna). She especially does not want to spend time with them or care/show love for them after what Torvald say about Krogstad poisoning his children with his lies. Another false and real love theme is from the fact that Anna, the children’s nanny, gave up her own child to look after Nora when she was a child. This shows she has real love for Nora and would do anything for her. My final outlook on false love is the relationship between Kristine and Krogstad. Yes, they were in love at one point but Christine left Krogstad for a richer man (false love) for the sake of her sick mother and younger brother (true love). Although, by some “miracle” Christine miraculously falls back into love with Krogstad and he takes her back. What the audience/reader is left pondering, has she really fell for him again or she doing it because of her love and friendship for Nora.
My other thought on the meaning of the play is possession and control. Possession is such a powerful word especially if you’re talking about possession of another human being. Torvald has complete ownership and power over Nora as whatever he says she does and whatever Torvald’s thoughts are she would have the same views as him. Also Krogstad is very much in control of Nora because he knows something about Nora that no one can ever find out. This gives Krogstad the power to make Nora feel as if she is going mad. “In case I go out of my mind.”
In the Helmer household there is such a clear pecking order with the characters. Torvald; very clearly is right at the top of this, Nora; who is utterly wrapped around Torvald’s finger controls Anna the nanny, then Anna; she controls and has possession over the children, as she is the one who they spend most of the time with. Krogstad is also in control of Nora.


conclusion
My first thoughts after reading the play and after seeing the stage production of A Doll’s House are in some ways different, but also some ways the same. My feelings that are still the same is that all the characters were people that I loved to hate. Some of them were more annoying than others but you enjoyed disliking them. I understand now, that is the persona that Ibsen wanted to give them.
I appreciate the title ‘A Doll’s House’ more so now because I realise now they all play a role in this ‘Doll’s house’. Each of them are manipulating and are being manipulated by someone during the course of the play. For instance, Torvald is manipulated by Nora when he regularly falls into the trap of giving her money, which he cannot really afford. Also when she uses her feminine charm. “...You must sacrifice yourself completely for me...”
Overall, my enjoyment of the play grows as I find out and grasp more about the Henrik Ibsen play.
Konstantin Stanislavsky - A response to the exercises and his ‘system’.

Round-the-table and Stanislavsky’s ‘system’
Stanislavsky didn’t want students, training actors and actors to just have to read/devise/create characters/create synopses of a play the ‘dry and intellectual’ way. He wanted to create a way that the students could all join in with and make it more like a theatre game. The way he has done this by is producing an exercise that involves: Relaxation; start to feel and realise the way your body can move, work and to also warm up the mussels and relax. Given circumstance; where is the place you have been given? Is it somewhere home like, unfamiliar, strange? Example ‘a hospital waiting room’. Justification; how you would feel at this time, what would you be doing in the place you have imagined at the time presented. Example ‘2a.m – May’.  Objective; what is your purpose of being in the place that you are in and the time. Example ‘to create a party atmosphere.’ Inner actions; A line of speech is give to you. You know you have to find the right moment to speak this line. Example ‘I’m sorry’ with or without awkward pause after. Actions; this card indicates the way you present and want your line of speech to come across. Example ‘to provoke’.
This part is much like a ‘Party game’ that is in Stanislavsky’s ‘system’, it is to do with your 5 sense memory and emotional memory. It is in 6 easy tasks, all sections are done blindfolded until the end of the 5th one. The first is to do with ‘feel’ and what the feeling of an object makes you remember. The second, is the same as the first but you are given gloves to wear, you must give the inanimate object for example gender or say if its old or new. The third, is ‘smell’ does it put an image in your head or bring back a childhood memory? The fourth, is ‘taste’ what does it taste like? Does it bring memories back? The fifth, ‘listen’ music is played, how does it make you feel?  How do you want to move when you hear it, do you want to move? The sixth and final section is ‘sight’, you picture yourself and others around you. Try to remember every detail on them. Remove blindfolds and see how much or how little you got correct.
By the end of these exercises, theatre games, party games, Stanislavsky would hope that students will have a better understanding of his ‘system’. “Experienced given circumstances, objectives, actions, justifications, adaptations, a sense of play and emotive memory.” After this he then thinks everyone is now ready to sit around  a table with the piece of text and read and analyse it




The Method of Physical Interactions
Stage 1: The Period of Study This is private and independent work using your imagination to prepare for the journey from self to character.
Read the Play  – reading the play; not at the bus stop or in a cafe, somewhere you can completely concentrate. This is so you can focus and not be distracted by irrelevant things around you.
Ask Questions– ask yourself questions; what’s the plot? What is the historical setting? What’s the style of the writing? What are the details of the theatrical and artistic production? How, in fact, are the roles characterised? How do you feel about the play? If you ask yourself these questions you will be able to understand more about the play and in more depth.
Get Your Imagination Going– By putting yourself into the situation of a your character or the setting of him/her you are bringing everything more to life. Stanislavsky puts forward the importance of not missing a single step because your imagination will not believe what you are doing. This increases you personal belief of ‘I am’ in the role. By doing this it can encourage you and your brain to really visualise yourself as your character and bring them more to life.
Appraise the Facts– focusing on the main events in the play. How would you come across their objectives? Encounters with other characters, what are your feelings towards them? By doing this you’re making the character your own and giving it your own tweaks.
Repeat the Above -By repeating the above twice, even three times, you can finely tune what you have already done. Every time you repeat a section you will find something will change in how you thought it would be the first time round.

Stage 2: The Period of Emotional Experience
The period of emotional experience is still imaginative and independent work but it assists the actor in working towards the emotional role of the character.

Compile an Imaginary ‘Score of Actions’.
What you most want/feel inside and show it on the outside without saying anything. Showing it through your physicality and not through your words can help the audience to believe your character and see how it is feeling more clearly.


Stage 3: The Period of Physical Embodiment
Taking real life situations that are happening right at this moment, but connecting them with the play. ‘emotional experience’ comes to you as you become more familiar with the characters and play.  ‘Physical embodiment’ is done independently but quickly turns into improvisation with other actors. This helps to stop making early characterisation clichéd.
Luring your body into actions, I feel helps to make a characters situation become more real and makes it easier to form a real reaction to a situation.

Active Analysis

Konstantin Stanislavsky’s work, the more you read and learn about it, the more we understand that his methods grow from his amazing imagination, not from it all written down in black and white and set in stone. Anything goes, if you want to tweak something slightly that’s okay! Each character you play from different plays all will have different development processes. No character is the same.